Property score
51.6
Fair
Overall 51.6 · Smaller than most nearby homes
680 sqft (bottom 1%) · Built in 1986 (2 yrs older than avg)
Located in a high-income area with median household income of ~106k
Transit 70.0 · 7-min walk to transit with 3 nearby routes · Within 500m: 5 parks nearby
Living Area
Below average
41% smaller than neighborhood avg.
Year Built
Near average
2 yrs older than neighborhood avg.
Mother tongue
English · 70%Tagalog · 6%
Past 10 years Mission Gardens sales snapshot (~80% of all data)
456
413k
$355/sqft
1988
Buying a home is more than a transaction. Our Winnipeg real estate agents provide market insights, pricing analysis, and neighbourhood expertise to help you decide with confidence.
Usually replies in a few minutes
Free · No credit card required
51.6 is composed by the two sections below.
Property Score
Community Score
Mission Gardens
How to read: Share of sales in each ~$50k price band for “mission gardens” (Detached houses (non-condo), 2024). The tallest band is the mainstream budget range; multi-year view shows how that band shifts over time.
Sales-to-New-Listings
1,196
sold
1,852
new listings
Manitoba Real Estate Association March public data on New Listings and Properties Sold across Manitoba
Sold Above Asking
Majority sold above asking
68 of 104 sold above asking · Manually compiled from MLS Winnipeg sold listings, May 4 – May 10, 2026
With a Sales-to-New-Listings ratio of 64.6% and 65% of homes selling above asking price, demand is clearly outpacing supply. Buyers are competing, which is putting upward pressure on prices.
Dissemination area (DA) — Statistics Canada 2021 Census · Area: #46110821
$106K
Median household income
$119K
Average household income
4%
Low income (LIM-AT)
0.2
Income inequality (Gini)
2.6
P90 / P10 ratio
16%
Single-person households
35%
Families with children
Figures are for the census dissemination area containing this listing location; sources and margins may apply per Statistics Canada.
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: fill length ≈ share of peers you outperform. Fill color reflects tier (red / blue / amber / gray). “Avg” is a rough median benchmark for comparable homes in that scope.
To see this property on a map next to nearby houses—and compare year built, living area, assessed value, and lot size in detail—open the neighbourhood analysis page.
Nearby stops, routes & transit score
Dining, education, healthcare, shopping & more
51 Cedargrove Crescent — 5 amenities found within 500 m, across 1 categories, including 5 parks (nearest 53 m).
Mission Gardens · WPS public data · 2026
Annual incidents
9
2026
vs. city avg
-69%
relative to avg
Year-over-year
▼ -93%
vs. prior year
Primary type
Property
67%
Same street
Same area
City-wide
| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Sold price | Top 27% | Top 39% | Top 46% |
Same street
Same area
City-wide
| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Sold price | Bottom 12% | Bottom 14% | Bottom 25% |
Request exact sold prices and history by email
Address · Year Built · Living Area
Address · Distance
Address · Tax-Assessed Value
Property Overview: 51 Cedargrove Crescent, Mission Gardens, Winnipeg
Key Characteristics & Appeal
This home at 51 Cedargrove Crescent is a compact, efficiently sized property built in 1986. Its key characteristic is its modest scale: with 680 sqft of living space and a 3,353 sqft lot, it is notably smaller than most homes on its street, in the Mission Gardens area, and across Winnipeg. This is reflected in its below-average rankings for size and lot area. However, its assessed value is relatively low and aligns more closely with city-wide averages, suggesting a potentially accessible entry point into the market.
The appeal lies in its practicality and position as a true starter home or a downsizing opportunity. It suits buyers seeking minimal upkeep, lower property taxes due to its assessment, and a manageable space. A thoughtful perspective is that while the home is smaller than its neighbours, its 1986 build date is actually newer than many homes city-wide, potentially meaning fewer immediate concerns with aging infrastructure compared to older stock. It’s ideal for a single person, a couple, or an investor looking for a straightforward, no-frills property in a stable neighbourhood.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is this a good value for a first-time buyer?
Based on the data, its assessed value is below average for its immediate area and street, which can translate to lower property taxes. For a buyer prioritizing getting into the market with lower ongoing costs over space, it represents a clear value proposition.
2. How does the sold price history inform its current value?
The home sold in the $350k-$400k range in 2023 and the $250k-$300k range in 2022. This sharp increase and subsequent high-tier ranking in 2023 suggest a period of significant market movement or property improvement. Understanding what drove that 2023 sale price would be key to evaluating its current market value.
3. What are the implications of the smaller lot size?
At 3,353 sqft, the lot is smaller than typical. This means lower maintenance but also limited potential for expansions or additions. It emphasizes the property’s role as a compact, efficient living space rather than one for extensive outdoor projects or privacy.
4. The data shows it's "below average" in size. How significant is this?
It's significant in terms of living space. With area averages being 1,020 to 1,342 sqft, this home is about half the size. Buyers must be comfortable with a cozy layout, but this also inherently promotes a simpler, lower-cost lifestyle.
5. Why is the city-wide assessed value average shown as $390k?
This appears to be a notable discrepancy in the provided data. The local and area assessed value averages are in the $34k-$37k range, while the city-wide figure is listed as $390k. This extreme variance suggests the city-wide comparison may be referencing a different metric or contain an error, and clarification on this point would be essential.
Radar charts, rankings, and side-by-side layouts work best on a larger screen. Open this page on a desktop browser for the full experience.
