Drag the yellow pegman onto the street for Street View. Or Open Street View in new tab →
Rank by area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Property Overview & Key Characteristics
This 884 sqft home, built in 1977, is a compact and efficiently priced property in Winnipeg's Marlton area. Its primary appeal lies in its exceptional value and competitive positioning within its immediate surroundings. While modest in size and without a basement or garage, it ranks in the top 1% of its street and top 0% of its broader community and all of Winnipeg for its price-to-footprint ratio, indicating it offers more space for the money than nearly all comparable listings. This presents a compelling, low-barrier entry point into the market.
The home would suit first-time buyers seeking an affordable start, investors looking for a manageable rental property, or downsizers wanting a cozy, low-maintenance living space without a premium price tag. A thoughtful perspective is that its high relative rankings suggest it's a "value anchor" in the area—a property that performs a specific economic function well, offering essential shelter efficiently rather than luxury features. Its age (49 years) means potential buyers should be prepared for the maintenance typical of a mature home, but its strong community ranking for age (newer than 71% of the neighborhood) indicates it's not among the oldest stock.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What does ranking in the "top 0%" for the community and city actually mean?
It means that, based on the metrics used (likely price per square foot), this property offers more interior space for its price point than 100% of the other listed properties in its community and across Winnipeg. It's a standout in terms of value for money.
2. Are there any major drawbacks given the low price and high value rankings?
The listing notes there is no basement or garage, which significantly impacts storage, utility space, and potential for expansion. The overall living area is also below average for the street and community, so space is efficiently used but limited.
3. The home is 49 years old. Should I be concerned about major repairs?
While the home is mature, its ranking shows it is newer than 71% of properties in its community, suggesting the surrounding housing stock is even older. A thorough inspection is always advised, but its age is relatively typical for the neighborhood.
4. Who would this property NOT be suitable for?
It would likely not suit buyers who require significant storage (due to no basement/garage), those needing multiple bedrooms or spacious living areas, or anyone seeking a modern, turn-key home without any update projects.
5. How should I interpret the different rankings for size, age, and value?
They measure different things. Its top rankings are for value (price vs. size). Its rankings for size alone are below average, confirming it's a smaller home. Its age ranking is above average in its community, meaning it's not the oldest. Together, this paints a picture of a smaller, relatively newer-for-the-area home priced very competitively for its space.
Neighbourhood
Varsity View
Year Built
1987
Living Area
2,055 sqft
Assessed Value
590k
Neighbourhood
Marlton
Year Built
1918
Living Area
816 sqft
Assessed Value
32.10k
Neighbourhood
Varsity View
Year Built
2017
Living Area
2,004 sqft
Assessed Value
670k
Neighbourhood
Varsity View
Year Built
1970
Living Area
1,183 sqft
Assessed Value
37.60k
Neighbourhood
Varsity View
Year Built
1952
Living Area
780 sqft
Assessed Value
30.80k
Neighbourhood
Varsity View
Year Built
1955
Living Area
1,039 sqft
Assessed Value
34.60k
Neighbourhood
Ridgedale
Year Built
1983
Living Area
3,093 sqft
Assessed Value
142.50k
Neighbourhood
Varsity View
Year Built
1957
Living Area
894 sqft
Assessed Value
32.50k
Neighbourhood
Elmhurst
Year Built
1985
Living Area
1,685 sqft
Assessed Value
50.60k
Neighbourhood
Roblin Park
Year Built
1973
Living Area
1,714 sqft
Assessed Value
460k
Address · Distance
Address · Assessed Value