Here is a clean, standalone write-up based on the provided property data.

Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile

This is a home that offers solid value with a clear trade-off. The main advantage is its assessed value relative to its living area. Ranked in the top 13% on its street for value ($400k vs. a $351.5k average), the property is considered above average in the Westwood neighborhood (top 30%) and roughly average citywide. This suggests a buyer is getting a home that appraises well above the street average, which can be useful for equity or resale positioning.

The property’s greatest standout feature is its age. Built in 1969, it ranks in the top 5% on the street and top 8% in the neighborhood. For buyers who prefer the character, construction materials, or established landscaping of an older home over a newer build, this is a rare find without the premium usually attached to a "vintage" property.

However, the trade-off is land area. At 5,124 sqft, the lot is below average for the street (top 84%), the neighborhood (bottom 8%), and slightly below the city average. This means a smaller yard and less outdoor space than most neighbours. The living area (1,140 sqft) is also slightly below average for the street and neighborhood, falling squarely in the middle of the city average.

The ideal buyer is someone who prioritizes indoor quality and location over a big yard. They might be downsizers, first-time buyers, or a couple looking for a well-valued home in a decent area who don’t need a large lot for gardening or children’s play. This property suits someone who wants a house that feels established and appraises well, accepting a more compact footprint both indoors and out.

Five Possible FAQs

1. How does the lot size compare to other homes in the area?
The lot is smaller than average. It ranks in the bottom 16% on Rouge Road and the bottom 8% in the Westwood neighborhood. Citywide, it is exactly average. If you value a large private yard, this may feel constrained.

2. Why is the assessed value relatively high compared to the house size?
The value appears to be driven strongly by the home's age and likely its condition or location within an established area. Newer homes on similar lots typically appraise lower, but older, well-maintained properties with good bones can carry a premium. The data shows it significantly outperforms its street and neighborhood in value.

3. Is the living area sufficient for a family?
At 1,140 sqft, this is smaller than the average home on the street and in the neighborhood. It is right on the city average. A small family or a couple would find it comfortable, but a growing family with teenagers might find it tight depending on the layout (basements are not included in this figure).

4. What does the "year built" ranking tell me about the construction?
Built in 1969, this home is older than roughly 95% of the homes on the same street. This usually implies solid mid-century construction (often with better lumber and simpler layouts). It is a strong selling point for buyers who dislike cookie-cutter new builds and appreciate established character.

5. How does this property rank citywide overall?
Citywide, this property is exactly average in living area, assessed value, and year built. It is also average for land area. The unique selling point is not that it is exceptional citywide, but that within its own street and neighborhood, it offers strong value and a notably older construction date—making it a standout in its immediate context.