Property score
39.2
Below average
Overall 39.2 · Smaller than most nearby homes
878 sqft (bottom 27%) · Built in 1971
Located in a above-average income area with median household income of ~63.2k
Transit 74.0 · 5-min walk to transit with 2 nearby routes · Within 500m: 1 school, 1 healthcare facility, 2 shops, and 1 park nearby
Living Area
Below average
15% smaller than neighborhood avg.
Year Built
Near average
0 yrs newer than neighborhood avg.
Mother tongue
English · 87%Punjabi · 21%
Past 10 years Westdale sales snapshot (~80% of all data)
538
375k
$318/sqft
1971
Buying a home is more than a transaction. Our Winnipeg real estate agents provide market insights, pricing analysis, and neighbourhood expertise to help you decide with confidence.
Usually replies in a few minutes
Free · No credit card required
39.2 is composed by the two sections below.
Property Score
Community Score
Westdale
How to read: Share of sales in each ~$50k price band for “westdale” (Detached houses (non-condo), 2024). The tallest band is the mainstream budget range; multi-year view shows how that band shifts over time.
Sales-to-New-Listings
1,196
sold
1,852
new listings
Manitoba Real Estate Association March public data on New Listings and Properties Sold across Manitoba
Sold Above Asking
Majority sold above asking
68 of 104 sold above asking · Manually compiled from MLS Winnipeg sold listings, May 4 – May 10, 2026
With a Sales-to-New-Listings ratio of 64.6% and 65% of homes selling above asking price, demand is clearly outpacing supply. Buyers are competing, which is putting upward pressure on prices.
Dissemination area (DA) — Statistics Canada 2021 Census · Area: #46111077
$63K
Median household income
$59K
Average household income
30%
Low income (LIM-AT)
0.3
Income inequality (Gini)
3.6
P90 / P10 ratio
12%
Single-person households
22%
Families with children
Figures are for the census dissemination area containing this listing location; sources and margins may apply per Statistics Canada.
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: fill length ≈ share of peers you outperform. Fill color reflects tier (red / blue / amber / gray). “Avg” is a rough median benchmark for comparable homes in that scope.
To see this property on a map next to nearby houses—and compare year built, living area, assessed value, and lot size in detail—open the neighbourhood analysis page.
Nearby stops, routes & transit score
Dining, education, healthcare, shopping & more
174 Westgrove Way — 5 amenities found within 500 m, across 4 categories, including 1 education (nearest 158 m), 1 healthcare (nearest 465 m), 2 shopping (nearest 443 m).
Westdale · WPS public data · 2026
Annual incidents
17
2026
vs. city avg
-42%
relative to avg
Year-over-year
▼ -91%
vs. prior year
Primary type
Violent
53%
Same street
Same area
City-wide
| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Sold price | Bottom 1% | Bottom 1% | Bottom 3% |
Request exact sold prices and history by email
Address · Year Built · Living Area
Address · Distance
Address · Tax-Assessed Value
This is a 1971 bungalow with 878 square feet of living space on a 1,380-square-foot lot. The property’s main draw is its year built: it ranks in the top 5% on the street for age, meaning it’s among the newer homes in an established area where most houses were built around the same time. Assessed value sits at $201,000, which is below both the street average ($230,800) and well below the citywide median. The living area is slightly smaller than the street average but significantly smaller than the neighborhood and city norms. The lot is also notably compact—among the smallest on the street and in the wider area.
The appeal here is less about space or land and more about affordability and relative newness in a well-established pocket of Westdale. Buyers who would suit this property are likely first-time homeowners looking for a lower entry price in a mature neighborhood, or downsizers who don’t need a large yard or extra square footage. It also suits someone who values the structural timeline—1971 construction in this area is on the newer side, which can mean fewer major renovation headaches than older stock. The low assessed value relative to neighbors also suggests potential for value growth if the area appreciates, though that’s not guaranteed.
1. How does the compact lot impact daily use or resale?
A 1,380 sqft lot is tight—it’s well below the neighborhood average of 5,168 sqft. Outdoor space is minimal, so this won’t suit someone wanting a garden, large deck, or room for kids to play. For resale, the small lot limits appeal to buyers who prioritize land, but it also means less maintenance and lower property taxes.
2. Why is the assessed value so much lower than the street average?
Assessed value reflects market factors like size, condition, and recent sales. The property’s living area and land are both smaller than most on the street, which pulls the value down. It’s not necessarily a sign of poor condition—just a smaller, more modest home compared to neighbors.
3. Is “top 5% for year built” a significant advantage?
In a neighborhood where most homes date to the early 1970s or earlier, being one of the newest can mean better insulation, updated electrical or plumbing, and fewer deferred maintenance issues. But “newer” in this context only goes back to 1971, so it’s not new by modern standards. Still, it’s a relative edge in an older area.
4. What are typical carrying costs beyond the mortgage?
With a low assessed value, property taxes should be modest. The small footprint and lot mean lower utility bills and less upkeep. Buyers should still budget for typical older-home costs like roof, furnace, and window replacements—age alone doesn’t guarantee everything is in good shape.
5. How does this property compare to condos or townhouses in the same price range?
For a similar price, a condo might offer amenities and less maintenance, but you’d own no land and pay monthly fees. This property gives you freehold ownership and a small yard, with potentially lower monthly costs. The trade-off is less community infrastructure and more personal responsibility for upkeep.
