| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Land Area 9,320 sqft | Top 3%3/99 Avg5,523 sqft Top 2%57/2872 Avg4,807 sqft Top 8%14837/194458 Avg6,570 sqft 56 Chadwick Crescent: For Land Area. On Chadwick Crescent, Elite — Top 3%, rank 3 of 99, and comparable homes in that group average about 5,523 sqft. in Canterbury Park, Elite — Top 2%, rank 57 of 2872, and comparable homes in that group average about 4,807 sqft. citywide, above average — Top 8%, rank 14837 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 6,570 sqft. | ||
Year Built 2001 （25 years ago） | Top 77%76/99 Avg2005 Top 45%1292/2872 Avg1997 Top 17%33373/194458 Avg1966 56 Chadwick Crescent: For Year Built. On Chadwick Crescent, below average — Top 77%, rank 76 of 99, and comparable homes in that group average about 2005. in Canterbury Park, around average — Top 45%, rank 1292 of 2872, and comparable homes in that group average about 1997. citywide, above average — Top 17%, rank 33373 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 1966. | ||
Living Area 1,410 sqft | Top 74%73/99 Avg1,583 sqft Top 42%1201/2872 Avg1,334 sqft Top 35%68099/194458 Avg1,342 sqft 56 Chadwick Crescent: For Living Area. On Chadwick Crescent, below average — Top 74%, rank 73 of 99, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,583 sqft. in Canterbury Park, around average — Top 42%, rank 1201 of 2872, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,334 sqft. citywide, around average — Top 35%, rank 68099 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,342 sqft. | ||
Assessed Value 47.40k | Top 65%64/99 Avg48.10k Top 32%918/2872 Avg40.90k Top 24%47018/194458 Avg390k 56 Chadwick Crescent: For Assessed Value. On Chadwick Crescent, around average — Top 65%, rank 64 of 99, and comparable homes in that group average about 48.10k. in Canterbury Park, around average — Top 32%, rank 918 of 2872, and comparable homes in that group average about 40.90k. citywide, above average — Top 24%, rank 47018 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 390k. | ||
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: colored length ≈ share of peers you outperform; vertical line ≈ median benchmark; white tick = your position. Badge tint: gold / blue / gray / dark gray for top ~1–5% / 5–30% / 30–70% / beyond.
Drag the yellow pegman onto the street for Street View. Or Open Street View in new tab →
Address · Distance
Address · Assessed Value