Property score
60.0
Fair
Overall 60.0 · Smaller than most nearby homes
930 sqft (bottom 14%) · Built in 1958 (3 yrs older than avg)
Located in a high-income area with median household income of ~91k
Transit 82.0 · 1-min walk to transit with 2 nearby routes · Within 500m: 1 school, 3 shops, 5 parks, and 1 place of worship nearby
Living Area
Below average
15% smaller than neighborhood avg.
Year Built
Below average
3 yrs older than neighborhood avg.
Mother tongue
English · 74%French · 8%
Past 10 years Windsor Park sales snapshot (~80% of all data)
1,217
395k
$375/sqft
1961
Buying a home is more than a transaction. Our Winnipeg real estate agents provide market insights, pricing analysis, and neighbourhood expertise to help you decide with confidence.
Usually replies in a few minutes
Free · No credit card required
60.0 is composed by the two sections below.
Property Score
Community Score
Windsor Park
How to read: Share of sales in each ~$50k price band for “windsor park” (Detached houses (non-condo), 2024). The tallest band is the mainstream budget range; multi-year view shows how that band shifts over time.
Sales-to-New-Listings
1,196
sold
1,852
new listings
Manitoba Real Estate Association March public data on New Listings and Properties Sold across Manitoba
Sold Above Asking
Majority sold above asking
68 of 104 sold above asking · Manually compiled from MLS Winnipeg sold listings, May 4 – May 10, 2026
With a Sales-to-New-Listings ratio of 64.6% and 65% of homes selling above asking price, demand is clearly outpacing supply. Buyers are competing, which is putting upward pressure on prices.
Dissemination area (DA) — Statistics Canada 2021 Census · Area: #46110592
$91K
Median household income
$91K
Average household income
6%
Low income (LIM-AT)
0.2
Income inequality (Gini)
2.6
P90 / P10 ratio
27%
Single-person households
27%
Families with children
Figures are for the census dissemination area containing this listing location; sources and margins may apply per Statistics Canada.
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: fill length ≈ share of peers you outperform. Fill color reflects tier (red / blue / amber / gray). “Avg” is a rough median benchmark for comparable homes in that scope.
To see this property on a map next to nearby houses—and compare year built, living area, assessed value, and lot size in detail—open the neighbourhood analysis page.
Nearby stops, routes & transit score
Dining, education, healthcare, shopping & more
46 Almond Bay — 10 amenities found within 500 m, across 4 categories, including 1 education (nearest 440 m), 3 shopping (nearest 286 m), 5 parks (nearest 135 m).
Windsor Park · WPS public data · 2026
Annual incidents
17
2026
vs. city avg
-42%
relative to avg
Year-over-year
▼ -94%
vs. prior year
Primary type
Property
47%
Same street
Same area
City-wide
| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Sold price | Top 7% | Top 12% | Top 34% |
Request exact sold prices and history by email
Address · Year Built · Living Area
Address · Distance
Address · Tax-Assessed Value
This is a 1958 home with 930 square feet of living space on a 6,387-square-foot lot, assessed at $367,000. What stands out here is the land-to-building ratio. The house itself is slightly undersized compared to city averages, but the lot is significantly larger than most properties on the street and in the wider Windsor Park neighbourhood. That combination—modest interior, generous yard—makes this property a stronger fit for someone who values outdoor space, gardening, or future expansion potential over finished square footage.
The assessed value ranks well above the street average (top 14%), which reflects the land premium more than the house size. On the street level, this property is essentially a standout lot with a modest home on it. Citywide, the value sits near the middle (top 48%), so it’s not overpriced relative to the broader market—it's the street and neighbourhood context that makes it interesting.
This property would suit a buyer who:
It’s less suited for someone looking for maximum interior space per dollar, or who wants a turnkey modern layout.
1. How does the living area compare to similar homes in the area, and why does it matter?
The home is 930 sqft, which is around average for its street but below average for the neighbourhood (1,091 sqft) and city (1,342 sqft). That means you’re getting less interior space than many nearby homes. However, the land area is above average at every level—street, neighbourhood, and city. So the trade-off is clear: smaller house, bigger yard. If you plan to add on, the lot gives you room to do that.
2. Is the assessed value of $367k reasonable for this property?
It ranks in the top 14% on the street and top 34% in the neighbourhood, which might seem high for a 930 sqft home. But most of that value is in the land. The street average is $331k, so you’re paying a premium for the lot. Citywide, it sits near the middle, so it’s not an outlier—just a property where the house isn’t the main asset.
3. What’s the significance of the 1958 build date?
It’s the oldest home on the street (tied with others built that year) but fairly typical for the neighbourhood and city. A 1958 home often means original mechanicals, potential for lead or asbestos in older finishes, and layout quirks. But it can also mean solid construction, mature landscaping, and a lot that predates modern subdivision standards. If you’re handy or planning a gut renovation, this could be an advantage.
4. How does the lot size compare, and what can I realistically do with it?
At 6,387 sqft, it’s in the top 14% on the street and top 24% citywide. That’s a genuinely large lot for an older urban neighbourhood. You have room for a garage addition, a large garden, a workshop, or—if zoning allows—a secondary suite or infill. Just keep in mind that the house footprint is small, so the usable yard is even larger relative to the building.
5. Should I be concerned about the “below average” rankings for living area and year built?
Not necessarily. The rankings are relative to comparables, not absolute measures of quality. A below-average living area means you’re paying for land, not square footage. An older build can be a positive if you want character or a renovation project. The key is to align your priorities: if you want a finished basement and open-concept kitchen, this isn’t it. If you value yard space and location over interior size, the numbers are in your favour.
Radar charts, rankings, and side-by-side layouts work best on a larger screen. Open this page on a desktop browser for the full experience.
