Property score
57.6
Fair
Overall 57.6 · Smaller than most nearby homes
842 sqft (bottom 12%) · Built in 1974 (2 yrs older than avg)
Located in a above-average income area with median household income of ~85k
Transit 82.0 · 1-min walk to transit with 2 nearby routes · Within 500m: 1 school, 1 shop, and 3 parks nearby
Living Area
Below average
25% smaller than neighborhood avg.
Year Built
Near average
2 yrs older than neighborhood avg.
Mother tongue
English · 58%Punjabi · 21%
Past 10 years Valley Gardens sales snapshot (~80% of all data)
652
325k
$343/sqft
1976
Buying a home is more than a transaction. Our Winnipeg real estate agents provide market insights, pricing analysis, and neighbourhood expertise to help you decide with confidence.
Usually replies in a few minutes
Free · No credit card required
57.6 is composed by the two sections below.
Property Score
Community Score
Valley Gardens
How to read: Share of sales in each ~$50k price band for “valley gardens” (Detached houses (non-condo), 2024). The tallest band is the mainstream budget range; multi-year view shows how that band shifts over time.
Sales-to-New-Listings
1,196
sold
1,852
new listings
Manitoba Real Estate Association March public data on New Listings and Properties Sold across Manitoba
Sold Above Asking
Majority sold above asking
68 of 104 sold above asking · Manually compiled from MLS Winnipeg sold listings, May 4 – May 10, 2026
With a Sales-to-New-Listings ratio of 64.6% and 65% of homes selling above asking price, demand is clearly outpacing supply. Buyers are competing, which is putting upward pressure on prices.
Dissemination area (DA) — Statistics Canada 2021 Census · Area: #46110886
$85K
Median household income
$97K
Average household income
8%
Low income (LIM-AT)
0.2
Income inequality (Gini)
2.5
P90 / P10 ratio
19%
Single-person households
26%
Families with children
Figures are for the census dissemination area containing this listing location; sources and margins may apply per Statistics Canada.
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: fill length ≈ share of peers you outperform. Fill color reflects tier (red / blue / amber / gray). “Avg” is a rough median benchmark for comparable homes in that scope.
To see this property on a map next to nearby houses—and compare year built, living area, assessed value, and lot size in detail—open the neighbourhood analysis page.
Nearby stops, routes & transit score
Dining, education, healthcare, shopping & more
211 Reay Crescent — 5 amenities found within 500 m, across 3 categories, including 1 education (nearest 390 m), 1 shopping (nearest 492 m), 3 parks (nearest 152 m).
Valley Gardens · WPS public data · 2026
Annual incidents
28
2026
vs. city avg
-5%
relative to avg
Year-over-year
▼ -94%
vs. prior year
Primary type
Property
71%
211 Reay Crescent: We are not showing a transaction history based solely on public data; that does not mean no sale ever occurred. You can still request details by email in the “Data notes” section below—we will look it up manually and reply with the most accurate information available.
Request exact sold prices and history by email
Address · Year Built · Living Area
Address · Distance
Address · Tax-Assessed Value
This is a compact, single-family home with 842 square feet of living space—well below the average for its street, neighbourhood, and city. It was built in 1974, placing it among the newer homes on Reay Crescent (top 25%) and slightly newer than average across Valley Gardens. The lot is a standard 5,001 square feet, which is close to the neighbourhood median. Its tax-assessed value of $312,000 is also around average for the area, sitting slightly below the local and city medians.
The property’s appeal lies in its ordinariness. It’s a plain, mid-70s bungalow on a modest lot, not oversized or particularly valuable. That makes it an interesting option for someone who values a newer build relative to the street, but doesn’t need much space—a downsizer, a single person, or a couple. It’s not a starter home for a growing family (too small) or a renovation flip (low upside in total value). It could also suit a buyer who wants a lower-maintenance property without the premium of a brand-new build, or someone who prioritizes location over square footage and is willing to trade space for being in this specific pocket of Valley Gardens.
Why is the living area ranked so low compared to the street and neighbourhood?
At 842 sqft, this home is roughly 25–30% smaller than the typical home on Reay Crescent and across Valley Gardens. That doesn’t mean it’s “bad”—it just reflects a narrower footprint. If you’re not someone who uses large rooms or extra bedrooms, the size may not be a drawback at all.
Does the above-average build year actually matter for this property?
A 1974 build isn’t old, but it’s not new either. The “above average” ranking mostly means it’s newer than many neighbouring bungalows from the 1960s or earlier. It won’t have modern insulation or layouts, but it avoids some of the maintenance headaches of much older homes.
How does the assessed value relate to what I’d actually pay?
Assessed value ($312k) is a tax baseline, not a market price. Because it’s around average for the area, it suggests the market doesn’t see this home as over- or under-priced relative to its lot and size. Expect an offer close to that range, but a well-maintained interior could justify a slight premium.
What are the downsides of a lot that’s “around average” for the neighbourhood?
A 5,001 sqft lot is a solid, standard city lot—great for a yard and garden, but not large enough for an addition or a laneway suite without a variance. It also means you’re not getting rare land value that might appreciate significantly over time.
Who should not buy this home?
Anyone looking for open-concept living, high ceilings, or a property that can be easily expanded. Also, families with two or more kids will find 842 sqft tight. It’s a functional, no-frills home for someone who values a newer build than the street average and doesn’t need extra space.
Radar charts, rankings, and side-by-side layouts work best on a larger screen. Open this page on a desktop browser for the full experience.
