Property score
67.4
Good
Overall 67.4 · Larger and newer than most nearby homes
1,360 sqft (top 22%) · Built in 2016 (28 yrs newer than avg)
Located in a above-average income area with median household income of ~83k
Transit 94.0 · 1-min walk to transit with 4 nearby routes · Within 500m: 4 dining spots, 3 healthcare facilitys, 2 shops, and 5 parks nearby
Living Area
Above average
17% larger than neighborhood avg.
Year Built
Above average
28 yrs newer than neighborhood avg.
Mother tongue
English · 63%Tagalog · 9%
Past 10 years Mission Gardens sales snapshot (~80% of all data)
456
413k
$355/sqft
1988
Buying a home is more than a transaction. Our Winnipeg real estate agents provide market insights, pricing analysis, and neighbourhood expertise to help you decide with confidence.
Usually replies in a few minutes
Free · No credit card required
67.4 is composed by the two sections below.
Property Score
Community Score
Mission Gardens
How to read: Share of sales in each ~$50k price band for “mission gardens” (Detached houses (non-condo), 2024). The tallest band is the mainstream budget range; multi-year view shows how that band shifts over time.
Sales-to-New-Listings
1,196
sold
1,852
new listings
Manitoba Real Estate Association March public data on New Listings and Properties Sold across Manitoba
Sold Above Asking
Majority sold above asking
68 of 104 sold above asking · Manually compiled from MLS Winnipeg sold listings, May 4 – May 10, 2026
With a Sales-to-New-Listings ratio of 64.6% and 65% of homes selling above asking price, demand is clearly outpacing supply. Buyers are competing, which is putting upward pressure on prices.
Dissemination area (DA) — Statistics Canada 2021 Census · Area: #46110822
$83K
Median household income
$98K
Average household income
13%
Low income (LIM-AT)
0.2
Income inequality (Gini)
3.3
P90 / P10 ratio
27%
Single-person households
25%
Families with children
Figures are for the census dissemination area containing this listing location; sources and margins may apply per Statistics Canada.
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: fill length ≈ share of peers you outperform. Fill color reflects tier (red / blue / amber / gray). “Avg” is a rough median benchmark for comparable homes in that scope.
To see this property on a map next to nearby houses—and compare year built, living area, assessed value, and lot size in detail—open the neighbourhood analysis page.
Nearby stops, routes & transit score
Dining, education, healthcare, shopping & more
8 Danakas Drive — 19 amenities found within 500 m, across 8 categories, including 4 dining (nearest 363 m), 3 healthcare (nearest 417 m), 2 shopping (nearest 91 m).
Mission Gardens · WPS public data · 2026
Annual incidents
9
2026
vs. city avg
-69%
relative to avg
Year-over-year
▼ -93%
vs. prior year
Primary type
Property
67%
8 Danakas Drive: We are not showing a transaction history based solely on public data; that does not mean no sale ever occurred. You can still request details by email in the “Data notes” section below—we will look it up manually and reply with the most accurate information available.
Request exact sold prices and history by email
Address · Year Built · Living Area
Address · Distance
Address · Tax-Assessed Value
This home sits on a 1,992 sqft lot with 1,360 sqft of living space, built in 2016. The property ranks exceptionally well on its street—first out of 22 homes for both living area and assessed value, putting it in the top 5% for Danakas Drive. Compared to the broader Mission Gardens area, the house is in the top 1% for its year built, meaning it’s significantly newer than most surrounding homes.
Where the property stands out less is lot size. While the land is close to average for the street (bottom 41%), it ranks in the bottom 1% citywide—a reminder that newer infill homes in established neighborhoods often trade yard space for a modern interior. The assessed value of $376,000 is above the street average but sits just inside the top half citywide, suggesting the home is priced competitively for what it offers.
The appeal here is a newer, well-maintained home in a walkable older area, rather than the privacy or outdoor space a large lot would provide. It would suit buyers who prioritize move-in condition, lower maintenance, and a good street over a big backyard. First-time buyers looking for a solid urban home, or downsizers who want a newer build without suburban yard chores, would likely find this a good fit.
1. How does the property’s age compare to other homes in Mission Gardens?
Built in 2016, it’s among the newest homes in the area—ranking in the top 1% for year built. Most surrounding homes are significantly older, so this is a rare newer option in an established neighborhood.
2. Is the assessed value in line with similar homes?
The assessed value is above the street average ($376k vs $354.5k), but the property is the top-ranked home on Danakas Drive. It sits in the top 42% for Mission Gardens, meaning it’s not overvalued relative to the area, but it does carry a premium for being the best on the block.
3. Why is the lot size ranked so low citywide if it’s average for the street?
In older Winnipeg neighborhoods like Mission Gardens, lots were historically larger. This home was built on an infill lot, which is smaller than the original subdivision lots nearby. It’s typical for newer construction in this part of the city.
4. What kind of maintenance or updates should a buyer expect?
At eight years old, the home is still relatively young. Major systems like the roof, furnace, and windows should have plenty of life left. The main thing to check is whether the builder used standard materials—some newer builds in this price range may need siding or deck work sooner than older, premium-built homes.
5. How does this property compare to the median Winnipeg home?
The living area is roughly average for the city (top 38% citywide), but the lot is well below average. The home is newer than the vast majority of Winnipeg listings (top 6% citywide). Buyers are essentially paying for a modern interior in a central location, not for space to expand.
