| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Land Area 4,614 sqft | Top 65%22/34 Avg5,071 sqft Top 50%1444/2872 Avg4,807 sqft Top 64%124071/194458 Avg6,570 sqft 51 Blumm Crescent: For Land Area. On Blumm Crescent, around average — Top 65%, rank 22 of 34, and comparable homes in that group average about 5,071 sqft. in Canterbury Park, around average — Top 50%, rank 1444 of 2872, and comparable homes in that group average about 4,807 sqft. citywide, around average — Top 64%, rank 124071 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 6,570 sqft. | ||
Year Built 2012 （14 years ago） | Top 6%2/34 Avg2012 Top 18%504/2872 Avg1997 Top 10%18518/194458 Avg1966 51 Blumm Crescent: For Year Built. On Blumm Crescent, above average — Top 6%, rank 2 of 34, and comparable homes in that group average about 2012. in Canterbury Park, above average — Top 18%, rank 504 of 2872, and comparable homes in that group average about 1997. citywide, above average — Top 10%, rank 18518 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 1966. | ||
Living Area 1,347 sqft | Top 97%33/34 Avg1,807 sqft Top 45%1297/2872 Avg1,334 sqft Top 39%75240/194458 Avg1,342 sqft 51 Blumm Crescent: For Living Area. On Blumm Crescent, below average — Top 97%, rank 33 of 34, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,807 sqft. in Canterbury Park, around average — Top 45%, rank 1297 of 2872, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,334 sqft. citywide, around average — Top 39%, rank 75240 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,342 sqft. | ||
Assessed Value 48.80k | Top 62%21/34 Avg50.40k Top 26%752/2872 Avg40.90k Top 22%42318/194458 Avg390k 51 Blumm Crescent: For Assessed Value. On Blumm Crescent, around average — Top 62%, rank 21 of 34, and comparable homes in that group average about 50.40k. in Canterbury Park, above average — Top 26%, rank 752 of 2872, and comparable homes in that group average about 40.90k. citywide, above average — Top 22%, rank 42318 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 390k. | ||
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: colored length ≈ share of peers you outperform; vertical line ≈ median benchmark; white tick = your position. Badge tint: gold / blue / gray / dark gray for top ~1–5% / 5–30% / 30–70% / beyond.
Drag the yellow pegman onto the street for Street View. Or Open Street View in new tab →
Address · Distance
Address · Assessed Value