Property score
56.3
Fair
Overall 56.3 · Smaller and older than most nearby homes
896 sqft (bottom 16%) · Built in 1971 (3 yrs older than avg)
Located in a high-income area with median household income of ~89k
Transit 86.0 · 2-min walk to transit with 4 nearby routes · Within 500m: 3 dining spots, 1 healthcare facility, 2 shops, and 2 parks nearby
Living Area
Below average
20% smaller than neighborhood avg.
Year Built
Below average
3 yrs older than neighborhood avg.
Mother tongue
English · 62%French · 8%
Past 10 years Vista sales snapshot (~80% of all data)
166
402.9k
$420/sqft
1974
Buying a home is more than a transaction. Our Winnipeg real estate agents provide market insights, pricing analysis, and neighbourhood expertise to help you decide with confidence.
Usually replies in a few minutes
Free · No credit card required
56.3 is composed by the two sections below.
Property Score
Community Score
Vista
How to read: Share of sales in each ~$50k price band for “vista” (Detached houses (non-condo), 2024). The tallest band is the mainstream budget range; multi-year view shows how that band shifts over time.
Sales-to-New-Listings
1,196
sold
1,852
new listings
Manitoba Real Estate Association March public data on New Listings and Properties Sold across Manitoba
Sold Above Asking
Majority sold above asking
68 of 104 sold above asking · Manually compiled from MLS Winnipeg sold listings, May 4 – May 10, 2026
With a Sales-to-New-Listings ratio of 64.6% and 65% of homes selling above asking price, demand is clearly outpacing supply. Buyers are competing, which is putting upward pressure on prices.
Dissemination area (DA) — Statistics Canada 2021 Census · Area: #46111004
$89K
Median household income
$90K
Average household income
8%
Low income (LIM-AT)
0.2
Income inequality (Gini)
2.6
P90 / P10 ratio
18%
Single-person households
24%
Families with children
Figures are for the census dissemination area containing this listing location; sources and margins may apply per Statistics Canada.
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: fill length ≈ share of peers you outperform. Fill color reflects tier (red / blue / amber / gray). “Avg” is a rough median benchmark for comparable homes in that scope.
To see this property on a map next to nearby houses—and compare year built, living area, assessed value, and lot size in detail—open the neighbourhood analysis page.
Nearby stops, routes & transit score
Dining, education, healthcare, shopping & more
176 Greenwood Avenue — 10 amenities found within 500 m, across 6 categories, including 3 dining (nearest 372 m), 1 healthcare (nearest 360 m), 2 shopping (nearest 268 m).
Vista · WPS public data · 2026
Annual incidents
1
2026
vs. city avg
-97%
relative to avg
Year-over-year
▼ -98%
vs. prior year
Primary type
Property
100%
Same street
Same area
City-wide
| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Sold price | Top 20% | Top 22% | Top 32% |
Same street
Same area
City-wide
| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Sold price | Top 48% | Bottom 44% | Bottom 49% |
Same street
Same area
City-wide
| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Sold price | Bottom 27% | Bottom 18% | Bottom 35% |
Request exact sold prices and history by email
Address · Year Built · Living Area
Address · Distance
Address · Tax-Assessed Value
176 Greenwood Avenue is a well-situated home that presents a specific value proposition. Its key appeal lies in its generous lot size within a mature neighborhood, offering potential for expansion or outdoor enjoyment that is increasingly rare. While the living space is modest compared to area averages, the property’s assessed value is firmly in line with the market, suggesting a fair entry point into the Vista neighborhood of Winnipeg.
Key Characteristics & Ideal Buyer
This 1971-built bungalow sits on a 5,199 sqft lot, which is notably larger than most on Greenwood Avenue itself. The home’s 896 sqft living area is compact, ranking below local and city averages. This creates a distinct dynamic: the land asset is strong, while the existing structure is efficient. The assessed value of $381k is consistently "around average" at every comparison level, indicating the property is priced appropriately for its overall package.
Its appeal is for the practical-minded buyer who sees potential beyond the current floor plan. It would suit a first-time buyer looking for a manageable home with room to grow outdoors, or an investor/renovator who values the lot size as the primary asset for future expansion, a garden, or addition. It’s less suited for those seeking immediate move-in-ready, spacious square footage.
1. Is the house too small?
The living area is below the average for the street, neighborhood, and city. It’s a compact layout best for individuals, couples, or small families comfortable with efficient living, or for those planning a future renovation to expand.
2. Why is the assessed value average if the house is smaller?
The assessment reflects the total property value, where the above-average lot size on a desirable street compensates. It indicates you are paying primarily for location and land, with the existing house at this price point.
3. What does the lot size actually offer?
Ranking in the top 25% on its street, the lot provides valuable outdoor space for recreation, gardening, or storage. For the right buyer, it also represents long-term potential for an addition, garage, or laneway house, subject to zoning.
4. How does the 1971 build year affect things?
It’s around average for the city. This typically means modern wiring and plumbing foundations may be present, but systems like the roof, windows, or furnace could be nearing or due for updates, which should be factored into inspection and budgeting.
5. Is this a good investment for the neighborhood?
The property sits in a stable, established area where values track consistently with city averages. Its value growth would likely depend more on future improvements to the structure itself, given the land is already a strong component.
Radar charts, rankings, and side-by-side layouts work best on a larger screen. Open this page on a desktop browser for the full experience.
