| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Land Area 6,136 sqft | Top 17%4/24 Avg5,830 sqft Top 25%760/3047 Avg5,494 sqft Top 28%54438/194458 Avg6,570 sqft 52 Prince Philip Crescent: For Land Area. On Prince Philip Crescent, above average — Top 17%, rank 4 of 24, and comparable homes in that group average about 5,830 sqft. in The Maples, above average — Top 25%, rank 760 of 3047, and comparable homes in that group average about 5,494 sqft. citywide, above average — Top 28%, rank 54438 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 6,570 sqft. | ||
Year Built 1976 （50 years ago） | Top 4%1/24 Avg1976 Top 24%733/3047 Avg1975 Top 39%75164/194458 Avg1966 52 Prince Philip Crescent: For Year Built. On Prince Philip Crescent, Elite — Top 4%, rank 1 of 24, and comparable homes in that group average about 1976. in The Maples, above average — Top 24%, rank 733 of 3047, and comparable homes in that group average about 1975. citywide, around average — Top 39%, rank 75164 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 1966. | ||
Living Area 1,562 sqft | Top 4%1/24 Avg1,117 sqft Top 6%178/3047 Avg1,146 sqft Top 27%52989/194458 Avg1,342 sqft 52 Prince Philip Crescent: For Living Area. On Prince Philip Crescent, Elite — Top 4%, rank 1 of 24, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,117 sqft. in The Maples, above average — Top 6%, rank 178 of 3047, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,146 sqft. citywide, above average — Top 27%, rank 52989 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,342 sqft. | ||
Assessed Value 33.50k | Top 67%16/24 Avg34.70k Top 67%2044/3047 Avg34.70k Top 59%115138/194458 Avg390k 52 Prince Philip Crescent: For Assessed Value. On Prince Philip Crescent, around average — Top 67%, rank 16 of 24, and comparable homes in that group average about 34.70k. in The Maples, around average — Top 67%, rank 2044 of 3047, and comparable homes in that group average about 34.70k. citywide, around average — Top 59%, rank 115138 of 194458, and comparable homes in that group average about 390k. | ||
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: colored length ≈ share of peers you outperform; vertical line ≈ median benchmark; white tick = your position. Badge tint: gold / blue / gray / dark gray for top ~1–5% / 5–30% / 30–70% / beyond.
Drag the yellow pegman onto the street for Street View. Or Open Street View in new tab →
Address · Distance
Address · Assessed Value