| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Year Built 1978 (48 years ago) | Top 44%108/246 Avg1977 Top 86%922/1069 Avg1994 Top 66%17789/26841 Avg1990 2-780 River Road: For Year Built. On River Road, around average — Top 44%, rank 108 of 246, and comparable homes in that group average about 1977. in River Park South, below average — Top 86%, rank 922 of 1069, and comparable homes in that group average about 1994. citywide, around average — Top 66%, rank 17789 of 26841, and comparable homes in that group average about 1990. | ||
Living Area 1,040 sqft | Top 12%30/246 Avg883 sqft Top 46%491/1069 Avg1,054 sqft Top 45%11973/26841 Avg1,042 sqft 2-780 River Road: For Living Area. On River Road, above average — Top 12%, rank 30 of 246, and comparable homes in that group average about 883 sqft. in River Park South, around average — Top 46%, rank 491 of 1069, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,054 sqft. citywide, around average — Top 45%, rank 11973 of 26841, and comparable homes in that group average about 1,042 sqft. | ||
Assessed Value 21.20k | Top 43%107/246 Avg22.70k Top 49%529/1069 Avg27.10k Top 57%15261/26841 Avg25.60k 2-780 River Road: For Assessed Value. On River Road, around average — Top 43%, rank 107 of 246, and comparable homes in that group average about 22.70k. in River Park South, around average — Top 49%, rank 529 of 1069, and comparable homes in that group average about 27.10k. citywide, around average — Top 57%, rank 15261 of 26841, and comparable homes in that group average about 25.60k. | ||
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: colored length ≈ share of peers you outperform; vertical line ≈ median benchmark; white tick = your position. Badge tint: gold / blue / gray / dark gray for top ~1–5% / 5–30% / 30–70% / beyond.
Drag the yellow pegman onto the street for Street View. Or Open Street View in new tab →
Property Overview & Key Characteristics
This 1,040 sqft home at 2-780 River Road in River Park South, built in 1978, presents a unique value proposition in the Winnipeg market. Its most defining feature is its exceptionally low municipal assessed value of $21,200, which places it in the top 14% of all Winnipeg properties for low assessment. This characteristic is the core of its appeal, suggesting a potentially very low property tax burden for the owner. The home’s living space is modest but above average for its immediate street and sits on a land parcel that ranks in the top 1% of its neighbourhood for size, hinting at valuable outdoor space or a generous lot footprint.
The property would suit a specific type of buyer: those who are budget-conscious regarding annual carrying costs, or investors and handy homeowners who see past the raw numbers and are prepared for a significant project. The appeal lies not in move-in readiness, but in the underlying value of the land and the potential for customization or substantial renovation. It’s a property for someone focused on long-term equity building rather than immediate convenience, possibly as a land-hold with an existing structure.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why is the assessed value so much lower than the nearby comparable properties?
A dramatically low assessment often reflects a specific condition of the property, such as it being deemed uninhabitable, requiring major repairs, or having a unique legal or physical characteristic. It is essential to investigate the specific reasons with the municipality and through professional inspections.
2. What does "Top 1% in neighbourhood" for Land Area actually mean for me?
This ranking indicates the lot is among the largest in River Park South. For a buyer, this means greater potential for outdoor living space, gardening, additions, or future development, subject to local zoning bylaws. The land itself may represent a significant portion of the property's value.
3. With no garage and a basic building type, what are the realistic expectations for this home?
Buyers should expect a property that requires updates and potentially major systems upgrades. The lack of a garage and unspecified building type suggest a focus on the essentials—the structure and the land. It is likely a candidate for a full renovation or rebuild to modern standards.
4. How useful are the provided property comparisons, like 66 Glenthorne Crescent?
They offer a general neighbourhood price context but can be misleading. The example at 66 Glenthorne has a similar assessed value but is in a different area (Minnetonka), highlighting that assessment is for taxation, not market value. The other comparables with much higher assessments underscore how atypical this listing's low assessment is.
5. Who should seriously consider viewing this property?
This property is best suited for experienced renovators, investors looking for a tax-efficient holding, or buyers with a flexible timeline who can manage a major project. It is less suitable for first-time buyers or anyone seeking a turn-key home, as the low assessment strongly implies substantial work is needed.
Address · Distance
Address · Assessed Value