19 Maralbo Avenue E – Property Summary

Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile

This is a compact, well-maintained home built in 1984, with 845 square feet of living space on a 3,003-square-foot lot in Winnipeg’s Worthington neighbourhood. Its standout feature is its age: it’s newer than 76% of homes on the same street, 82% of homes in the area, and 70% citywide. For buyers who prioritize a more recent build over square footage, that’s a meaningful advantage—meaning fewer immediate concerns around outdated electrical, plumbing, or foundation work, and potentially lower maintenance costs in the short term.

The assessed value ($309,000) is slightly below the street average but around the neighbourhood and city medians, which suggests the pricing is realistic for what’s offered. The living area, however, is notably small—below average at every geographic level—so this isn’t a home for anyone needing generous interior space. The lot is also tight, especially by Worthington and Winnipeg standards, though it’s typical for Maralbo Avenue itself.

Where this property’s appeal really lies is in its relative affordability compared to newer, larger homes in the same area, combined with the peace of mind that comes from a 1980s build. It’s a practical entry point for first-time buyers or downsizers who value efficiency over elbow room, and who want to avoid the compromises that often come with much older starter homes. The neighbourhood is established; you’re getting a home that’s been part of a mature street for nearly 40 years, not a speculative new development.

Five Possible FAQs

1. The living area is ranked below average at every level. Is the home uncomfortably small?
At 845 square feet, it’s compact but not unusually small for a 1980s bungalow or side-split. The size is well below the neighbourhood average (1,082 sqft) and citywide median (1,342 sqft), so if you’re used to open-plan spaces or need room for a growing family, it will feel tight. For a single person, couple, or someone moving from an apartment, it’s likely workable. Look at the floor plan directly to decide if the layout makes efficient use of the space.

2. How reliable is the “year built” advantage for a home built in 1984?
A 1984 build is roughly 20 years newer than the average home in the area (1962) and 18 years newer than the citywide average (1966). That’s enough to expect modern building code standards for its time, including insulation and wiring. It won’t have the efficiency of a new build, but it’s far more predictable than a century home. You’ll still want an inspection focused on roof age, HVAC systems, and windows, which may now be due for updates after 40 years.

3. The assessed value is $309k. How does that compare to recent sale prices on the street?
Assessed value is the city’s estimate for property tax purposes, not a market valuation. It can lag behind real sale prices, especially in a changing market. The street average assessed value is $336.8k, and this home is below that, which may mean it’s priced to move—or it could reflect that the interior needs updating. Check recent sold data rather than relying on assessment alone.

4. The lot is only 3,003 square feet. What does that mean practically?
That’s on the smaller side even for the street (average 3,890 sqft) and significantly below the neighbourhood and city averages (7,831 sqft and 6,570 sqft). Expect a modest front yard and a backyard that’s more patio-sized than lawn-sized. It’s fine for low-maintenance outdoor living but not for gardening, large dogs, or adding an extension without dealing with tight setback restrictions.

5. Who is this home not a good fit for?
Anyone looking for a family-sized home with room to grow, buyers who want a large lot for outdoor projects or expansion, and those seeking a “turnkey” property with no imminent updates. The compact size and small lot will be limiting for many households. It’s best approached as a practical, efficient home rather than a long-term flexible space.