Property score
75.2
Good
Overall 75.2 · Smaller but newer than most nearby homes
1,510 sqft (bottom 21%) · Built in 1946 (6 yrs newer than avg)
Located in a high-income area with median household income of ~101k
Transit 76.0 · 1-min walk to transit with 1 nearby route · Within 500m: 3 parks, 2 fuel stations, and 1 place of worship nearby
Living Area
Below average
36% smaller than neighborhood avg.
Year Built
Above average
6 yrs newer than neighborhood avg.
Mother tongue
English · 85%French · 2%
Past 10 years Wellington Crescent sales snapshot (~80% of all data)
208
707.5k
$349/sqft
1940
Buying a home is more than a transaction. Our Winnipeg real estate agents provide market insights, pricing analysis, and neighbourhood expertise to help you decide with confidence.
Usually replies in a few minutes
Free · No credit card required
75.2 is composed by the two sections below.
Property Score
Community Score
Wellington Crescent
How to read: Share of sales in each ~$50k price band for “wellington crescent” (Detached houses (non-condo), 2024). The tallest band is the mainstream budget range; multi-year view shows how that band shifts over time.
Sales-to-New-Listings
1,196
sold
1,852
new listings
Manitoba Real Estate Association March public data on New Listings and Properties Sold across Manitoba
Sold Above Asking
Majority sold above asking
68 of 104 sold above asking · Manually compiled from MLS Winnipeg sold listings, May 4 – May 10, 2026
With a Sales-to-New-Listings ratio of 64.6% and 65% of homes selling above asking price, demand is clearly outpacing supply. Buyers are competing, which is putting upward pressure on prices.
Dissemination area (DA) — Statistics Canada 2021 Census · Area: #46110378
$101K
Median household income
$122K
Average household income
7%
Low income (LIM-AT)
0.3
Income inequality (Gini)
3.6
P90 / P10 ratio
32%
Single-person households
22%
Families with children
Figures are for the census dissemination area containing this listing location; sources and margins may apply per Statistics Canada.
Rank by land area, larger = better rank
Rank by year, newer = better rank
Rank by living area, larger = better rank
Rank by assessed value, higher = better rank
Bar: fill length ≈ share of peers you outperform. Fill color reflects tier (red / blue / amber / gray). “Avg” is a rough median benchmark for comparable homes in that scope.
To see this property on a map next to nearby houses—and compare year built, living area, assessed value, and lot size in detail—open the neighbourhood analysis page.
Nearby stops, routes & transit score
Dining, education, healthcare, shopping & more
143 Borebank Street — 6 amenities found within 500 m, across 3 categories, including 3 parks (nearest 331 m).
Wellington Crescent · WPS public data · 2026
Annual incidents
13
2026
vs. city avg
-56%
relative to avg
Year-over-year
▼ -93%
vs. prior year
Primary type
Property
77%
Same street
Same area
City-wide
| Metric | Same street | Same area | City-wide |
|---|---|---|---|
Sold price | Bottom 8% | Bottom 3% | Bottom 36% |
Request exact sold prices and history by email
Address · Year Built · Living Area
Address · Distance
Address · Tax-Assessed Value
Key Characteristics & Appeal
This 1,510 sqft home, built in 1946, sits on a 6,000 sqft lot on Borebank Street in the Wellington Crescent area. It stands out most on its own street, where it ranks in the top 15% for living area and top 17% for lot size—meaning it’s one of the larger, roomier homes on the block. Its assessed value of $449,000 is also above the street average, reinforcing its position as a solid, well-proportioned property in a desirable pocket.
The appeal here is subtle but real. While the living area and land are below the sprawling Wellington Crescent neighbourhood average—where many homes are larger and more expensive—they’re above the citywide norm. That means you get a home that feels generous by city standards, without the premium price tag of its immediate neighbours. It’s not the newest build (1946 is older citywide), but the street and area have a mix of similar vintage homes, so you’re buying into established character, not a fixer-upper in a sea of new builds.
This property suits buyers who want a solid, above-average home on a good street, but who aren’t chasing the top tier of the neighbourhood. Think: someone who values space and lot size over a brand-new kitchen or a prestige address, or a buyer who sees long-term value in a home that’s comfortable now but has room to personalize. It’s a grounded choice for those who prefer a well-located, slightly understated home over the flashiest option on the block.
Five Possible FAQs
How does this property compare to others in the Wellington Crescent area?
It’s smaller in both living area and land than the neighbourhood average—the area median home is around 2,343 sqft on 9,488 sqft lots. However, it’s also priced well below the neighbourhood average of $805,600. You’re getting a home that’s above citywide averages but below the top end of its own neighbourhood, which can be a sweet spot for value.
Is this an older home that needs a lot of work?
Not necessarily. The house was built in 1946, which is older than the citywide median (1966), but it’s actually newer than the average home in this part of Wellington Crescent (1940). On Borebank Street itself, the average build year is 1947, so it fits right in. Age doesn’t automatically mean poor condition—many homes of this era have been well-maintained or updated—but a proper inspection is always wise.
Why is the property ranked high on its street but low in the neighbourhood?
Borebank Street has smaller, more modest homes than the wider Wellington Crescent area. The property looks strong relative to its immediate neighbours, but the overall neighbourhood includes larger estates and riverfront properties that push the averages up. This is common in areas with mixed housing stock—you can be a standout on your block without competing with the mansions down the road.
What does “rank” mean here, and how should I interpret the colours?
The ranks compare this property to similar homes within the same scope (street, neighbourhood, or city). A rank of #62 out of 404 on the street means only 61 homes are larger. The bar fill shows what percentage of peers you outperform; fill colour just indicates the tier (e.g., top 15% is one colour, bottom 15% another). It’s a quick visual, but the raw numbers and medians matter more for real comparison.
If I buy this, what should I look at most closely?
Beyond a standard home inspection, pay attention to the lot (6,000 sqft is generous for the city but not massive here) and how the 1,510 sqft of living space is laid out—older homes can have chopped-up floor plans. Also check the age of major systems (roof, furnace, wiring). The assessed value of $449k gives you a baseline, but your own offer should reflect the actual condition, not just the data.
