Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile

This is a compact, low-maintenance property with a living area of 1,400 square feet (tax-assessed value of $140,000) situated on a 2,833-square-foot lot. Built in an era when smaller, more efficient homes were standard, it ranks in the top 0% on its street for assessed value—meaning it outperforms every other home on Duck Creek Drive in that metric. However, it sits in the bottom 1% of its broader Rosser-Old Kildonan area and bottom 2% citywide, reflecting that while the home is a standout on its immediate block, the neighbourhood overall includes many higher-value properties.

The home’s appeal lies in its predictability. For a buyer who wants to know exactly what they’re getting—and not overpay for square footage they won’t use—this property offers a clear cost-to-space ratio. The lot is small, which means less upkeep but also less room for expansion. The year-built and lot-size rankings (bottom 4% and bottom 9% in the area, respectively) confirm this is not a home for someone seeking a large yard or a newer build.

Who it suits: First-time buyers looking to enter the market without stretching their budget; downsizers who want to free up equity and reduce maintenance; investors seeking a lower-cost entry point in a neighbourhood where median values are significantly higher ($544,700 area average, $390,100 citywide). It may also appeal to someone who values hyper-local metrics—being the top performer on the street gives a certain cachet, even if the home itself is modest.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How do the rankings work, and why is the property top on its street but bottom in the area?
The rankings compare this home to three different peer groups: same street, same neighbourhood (Rosser-Old Kildonan), and citywide (Winnipeg). On Duck Creek Drive, the home is the highest-valued property, which pushes it to the top 0%. But that street likely has a mix of older, smaller homes. When compared to the entire neighbourhood, which includes larger homes on bigger lots, the property falls to the bottom 1%. The citywide bottom 2% ranking reinforces that this is a small, older home relative to the broader market.

2. What do the fill bars and colors mean?
The bar length represents the share of comparable homes you outperform in each category. A fuller bar means you rank higher. The color is a tier system—red, blue, amber, or gray—but the page does not specify the exact thresholds for each. Generally, red might indicate top-tier performance, while gray could mean bottom-tier. The “Avg” shown is a rough median for comparable homes in that scope, not an exact calculation.

3. Can I see this property on a map next to nearby houses?
Yes. The “Open neighbourhood map analysis” link at the bottom of the rankings section leads to a map view where you can compare year built, living area, assessed value, and lot size of this property against nearby homes. This is useful for understanding how the rankings translate to physical proximity.

4. Is the tax-assessed value of $140,000 the same as the market price?
No. Tax-assessed value is a municipal valuation used for property tax calculations, not a market appraisal. It often lags behind current market conditions and may be lower or higher than what a home would sell for. Always rely on a comparative market analysis from a local agent for a realistic listing price.

5. What are the practical implications of the small lot and older construction?
A 2,833-square-foot lot (roughly 50 by 57 feet) means limited outdoor space—suitable for a small garden or patio, but not for a large playset or expansion. The older construction may come with pre-2000-era building materials and systems, so budget for potential updates to insulation, wiring, or plumbing. On the upside, older homes in established neighbourhoods often have mature trees, stable streets, and a stronger sense of community than new subdivisions.